THE Chancellor’s cost-of-living package was welcomed by some, but he has been reminded it will 'not be enough' to save millions from hardship in the coming months.
Kirsty Blackman, SNP work and pensions spokesperson, said: "While some of the measures announced by the Chancellor, including his U-turn on the SNP's repeated calls to turn his energy loan into a more generous grant, are welcome, it's clear that they still fall desperately short of what is needed at this critical time.
“The Chancellor is sitting on an estimated £30bn of fiscal headroom but has only chosen to spend around £15bn. While people are sitting in cold houses and turning to food banks, Rishi Sunak is sitting on £15bn as an election war chest."
READ MORE:What is in Chancellor Rishi Sunak's new £15bn cost of living package?
The Scottish Greens said it 'doesn't go far enough'.
Ross Greer, Scottish Greens finance spokesperson, said: “Rishi Sunak has presided over record food prices, record fuel prices and record household energy bills, yet for months he claimed there was nothing he could do.
“In a transparent attempt to distract from his own Government’s outrageous behaviour he has now finally been forced to act. These measures don’t go nearly far enough to support struggling families.”
The Scottish Tories had previously been against a windfall tax but support the chancellor.
READ MORE:Energy price rises around Europe and what governments are doing about it
Liam Kerr, Scottish Conservatives energy spokesperson, said: "As Conservatives we are instinctively against raising taxes but the scale of the cost-of-living crisis requires action.
“I have sought and received assurances that the measures the Chancellor has put in place will not undermine the oil and gas industry that supports 100,000 Scottish jobs, or stifle investment in this crucial industry.”
Meanwhile charities said the poorest are still going to be hit the hardest.
Derek Mitchell, Citizens Advice Scotland chief executive, said: “People have been desperate for support and today’s announcement is very welcome, however those on low incomes are still going to feel a significant squeeze on their household budgets and no one should be in any doubt about what that means - people choosing between feeding their children or keeping them warm.”
Imran Hussain, director of policy and campaigns at Action for Children, added: “The measures announced today will help, but won’t fully shield families with children from the pain they’re experiencing.
"With more mouths to feed, more rooms to heat and more clothes to wash, families with children feel price rises the most and are at greatest risk of falling into poverty.
“Ultimately, we need a stronger social security system to ensure all families with children can meet their basic needs.”
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel