Survivors of abuse at Fornethy House will be unable to access compensation from a Scottish Government scheme after Kate Forbes rejected calls from MSPs to allow them.

More than 200 women have come forward with allegations of abuse relating to the residential school in Angus dating back to the 1960s and 70s.

Former residents ay they were beaten, humiliated, force-fed and sexually assaulted during their short-term stays at the school, which was then run by Glasgow’s local authority. The Scottish Government previously said the scheme could not cover those from Fornethy House due to requirement for the residents to stay in long-term care and to meet strict evidence requirements.

The Deputy First Minister has now refused to amend the eligibility criteria to include the survivors in the Redress Scotland scheme.

The scheme offers up to £100,000 in compensation for people abused in residential care prior to 2004.

Updated regulations in December 2021 stipulated abuse survivors who were placed in short-term respite or holiday care under arrangements with a parent or guardian were excluded from the compensation scheme.

Last month, the Scottish Parliament’s Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee said its unanimous view was that the Fornethy survivors should be included in the scheme.

In a letter to Ms Forbes, committee convener Jackson Carlaw said the exemption regulations were an “unjustified barrier preventing those who experienced abuse in settings such as Fornethy House” as many of the children at the residential home had “limited or no contact” with their parents and relied on the institution for daily care.

The letter also recommended ministers include residential institutions that were owned and operated by the state, regardless of length of stay, in the compensation scheme, while enabling redress where the abuse was carried out by staff employed by the state regardless of whether parental consent for the child’s placement had been received.

In her reply to the committee, Ms Forbes said the length of the stay is “not a relevant consideration” but rather the “intended purpose of the stay”, and also said consent was not relevant.

Citing an independent report commissioned by her predecessor as deputy first minister, she said it “is clear that children attended Fornethy House primarily on a short-term basis for convalescence or a recuperative holiday under arrangements involving their parent or guardian and another person”.

She added: “Without more definitive evidence we cannot say with certainty that parents or guardians gave full and informed consent to the placement of every survivor.

“However, we can say that such evidence as exists indicates that the placements were made under arrangements involving their parent or guardian, and as such fall within the circumstances set out (in the exception regulation).”

Ms Forbes concluded: “After careful consideration of these issues, I have decided not to amend the eligibility criteria for Scotland’s Redress Scheme.”

She thanked the survivors for the bravery in sharing their experiences with the committee and said they had suffered “horrendous abuse”.